Shield) hinein lieu of a harness. However, Cybex states the side impact final rule did not consider CRSs that use a forward restraining surface. Cybex argued that the 25-degree dummy arm positioning required rein the new FMVSS No. 213a standard could not be met in forward facing CRSs with restraining https://intern.ee.aeust.edu.tw/home.php?mod=space&uid=1934441